Course Overview
|
Course Title |
Korean Buddhist Philosophers |
Lecturers |
Hyekyung Jee, ByungWook Lee |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Target Audience |
Foreign students, university students, and the general public interested in Korean Buddhist philosophy |
Teaching Assistant(s) |
- |
|
Course Field |
Philosophy |
Level |
Beginner |
|
Course Description |
Learn about Korean Buddhism from the Three Kingdoms period to the Joseon dynasty by studying the lives and philosophies of Korean Buddhist philosophers. |
|---|---|
|
Learning Outcomes |
1. Understand the lives and major philosophical characteristics of important figures in Korean Buddhist philosophy. 2. Be able to explain the influence of Buddhist philosophers throughout Korean history. 3. Distinguish and explain the differences between key Buddhist schools in Korea, such as Hwaeom and Seon. 4. Gain an overall understanding of how Korean Buddhism has changed over time. |
Course Structure
Week |
Topic |
Contents |
|---|---|---|
|
Week 1 |
Overview of Korean Buddhism |
By studying the life of the Buddha, delve into Buddhism’s cyclical worldview, core doctrines of the Middle Way, Dependent Origination, No-Self, and the Four Noble Truths. Then, examine the characteristics of various doctrinal schools introduced into Korea and trace the historical development of Korean Buddhism. |
|
Week 2 |
Monks Studying Abroad — Seungnang, Woncheuk, Won-gwang, Ja-jang |
Among many students who traveled to China at that time, explore the lives of Seungnang and Woncheuk, who remained active in China, and learn about the Madhyamaka philosophy studied by Seungnang and the Yogacara philosophy studied by Woncheuk. Among those who returned to Korea, examine Won-gwang and Ja-jang, who contributed to the development of Silla, and study their thought. |
|
Week 3 |
Philosophers of the Hwaeom School — Uisang, Gyunyeo |
After reviewing key events in the life of Uisang, examine his Hwaeom (華嚴) Dharma Realm Diagram and ideas about equality. Also study temples believed to have been founded by Uisang. Learn about Gyunyeo’s rise to fame and the philosophical features of his thought. |
|
Week 4 |
The Most Respected Buddhist Philosopher Among Koreans — Wonhyo |
Explore various legendary stories from Wonhyo’s life, along with his representative philosophical ideas: Ilshim (One Mind), Hwajaeng (Harmonization of Disputes), and Muae (No Hindrance). |
|
Week 5 |
Philosophers of the Cheontae School(天台宗) — Je-gwan, Ui-cheon, Yo-se, Unmukmugi |
Examine, in chronological order, the lives and philosophies of Cheontae thinkers active during the Goryeo dynasty. Look at Daegak Guksa (National Preceptor) Ui-cheon’s role and the significance of the Baengnyeon (White Lotus) movement. |
|
Week 6 |
Philosophers of the >Seon School(禪宗) in the Unified Silla Period — Nine Mountain Seon Schools (Do-ui, Hong-cheok, Hye-cheol, Mu-yeom, Beom-il, Do-yun, Hyeon-uk, Do-heon, Lee-eom) |
First, examine the main features and historical development of Seon (Zen) Buddhism, and study the Hongzhou School(洪州宗) which influenced Korean Buddhism. Then, learn about the lives and philosophical characteristics of those who began the “Nine Mountain Seon Schools,” including Do-ui, Hong-cheok, Hye-cheol, Mu-yeom, Beom-il, Do-yun, Hyeon-uk, Do-heon, and Lee-eom. |
|
Week 7 |
Philosophers of the Seon School in the Goryeo Dynasty — Sun-ji, Lee Ja-hyeon, Dam-jin, Jinul, Hyesim, Na-ong, Bo-u |
Study, in chronological order, the Seon thinkers of the Goryeo dynasty. Examine the lives and thought of early figures such as Sun-ji, Lee Ja-hyeon, and Dam-jin, then look at how Jinul and his disciple Hyesim carried on that tradition. Also learn about Na-ong and Bo-u. |
|
Week 8 |
Philosophers Who Contributed to History and Culture; Jinpyo, Doseon, Hyecho, Iryeon |
Explore Jinpyo, who practiced with a desperate heart; Doseon, who established the theory of Korean geomancy; Hyecho, who traveled far to India to study Buddhist truth; and Iryeon, who compiled and passed down historical legends related to Korean Buddhism. |
|
Week 9 |
Buddhist Thinkers of the Joseon Period 1; Mu-hak, Hamheo Deuktong, Kim Si-seup, Bo-u, Hyujeong, Yu-jeong, Seon-su |
In chronological order, study the lives and thought of major Buddhist philosophers who were active during the Joseon period. Begin with Mu-hak, who contributed to the founding of the Joseon dynasty, and learn about Hamheo Deuktong’s advocacy of similarities between Buddhism and Confucianism in response to criticisms by Confucian scholars, as well as the positive attitude toward Buddhist thought held by Kim Si-seup. Next, learn about Bo-u, who hoped to revive Buddhism during times of oppression, and Hyujeong and Yu-jeong, who elevated Buddhism’s status by leading monastic armies during the Imjin War, along with Seon-su, who chose not to join the monastic armies but strove to preserve Buddhist teachings. |
|
Week 10 |
Buddhist Thinkers of the Joseon Period 2; Unbong Daeji, Baekam Seongchong, Baekgok Cheoneung, Choui, Jinmuk, Kim Dae-hyeon / Conclusion |
Study the lives and ideas of late Joseon masters such as Unbong Daeji, Baekam Seongchong, Baekgok Cheoneung, Choui, and Jinmuk, in chronological order, and also learn about Kim Dae-hyeon, who was not a monk but lived as a Buddhist practitioner. |
Course Overview
|
Course Title |
Korean Confucian Philosophers |
Lecturer(s) |
Yeong-jin Choi & 9 colleagues |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Target Audience |
Domestic and international learners interested in Korean philosophy. |
Teaching Assistant(s) |
- |
|
Course Field |
Humanities (Humanistic Studies) |
Level |
General |
|
Course Description |
By examining representative philosophers of Korean Confucianism, this course provides an understanding of how Korean Confucianism developed and aims to clarify the unique characteristics of Korean Confucianism. |
|---|---|
|
Learning Outcomes |
1. Students will be able to identify not only famous figures such as Toegye Yi Hwang, Yulgok Yi I, and Dasan Jeong Yakyong, but also lesser-known Confucian philosophers in Korean history. 2. Students can discuss the development of Korean Confucianism, from the late Goryeo/early Joseon period to the modern era, while being introduced to a variety of Confucian philosophers. 3. Students can explain the main features of Neo-Confucianism, which played the most significant role in Korean Confucianism, and describe how Korean Confucianism—though centered on Neo-Confucianism—also included other currents such as female Confucianism, Silhak (practical learning), and Yangming studies. |
Course Structure
Week |
Topic |
Contents |
|---|---|---|
|
Week 1 |
Korea's Representative Confucian Scholars |
1. Intro: Why “Toegye, Yulgok, and Dasan”? |
|
Week 2 |
Confucian Scholars of the Late Goryeo/Early Joseon Period |
1. Introduction: Neo-Confucianism and its Acceptance |
|
Week 3 |
Characteristics and Genealogy of Early Joseon Dao; learning (Do-hak) |
1. Do-haki> (Dao-learning) |
|
Week 4 |
Toegye’s Academic Successors |
1. Opening |
|
Week 5 |
How 17th-Century Joseon Confucianism Responded |
1. Social Context of 17th-Century Joseon and its Philosophical Tasks and Responses |
|
Week 6 |
Formation and Development of the Horak Debate |
1. Opening: Have You Heard of the Horak Debate? |
|
Week 7 |
Korean Female Confucian Scholars |
1. Opening: 18th-Century Joseon Neo-Confucianism Awakens Female Agency |
|
Week 8 |
Korean Silhak Lineage |
1. Two Lineages of Korean Silhak: Nam-in (南人) vs. No-ron (老論) |
|
Week 9 |
Ha-gok Jeong Je-du and the Establishment of Korean Yangming Studies |
1. Yangming Studies Are Heretical |
|
Week 10 |
How Should We View 19th-Century Korean Neo-Confucianism? |
1. Introduction |
Course Overview
|
Course Title |
Korean Daoist Philosophers |
Lecturer(s) |
SeongHwan Kim, Jinsik Shin, YounGyeong Kim, Ilbeom Choi, Hojun Sung, Jaeseo Jung, Jinsik Shin, Minhwan Jo |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Target Audience |
Domestic and international university students, general public |
Teaching Assistant(s) |
- |
|
Course Field |
Humanities |
Level |
General |
|
Course Description |
This course aims to discover and introduce Korean Daoist philosophers, their lives, and their major writings. By doing so, it seeks to bring balance to the Korean philosophical and intellectual scene, which has been heavily oriented towards Confucianism. |
|---|---|
|
Learning Outcomes |
1. After completing this course, learners will be able to explain the similarities and differences between Daoism in East Asia and Korean Daoist or “Immortal” (Sinseon) thought. |
Course Structure:
Week |
Topic |
Contents |
|---|---|---|
|
Week 1 |
Korean Daoist Philosophers |
Prologue: Is there Daoism in Korea? |
|
Week 2 |
Korea’s Primitive Immortal Thought |
Prologue: Emergence of Immortal Thought, the Voyage to the Three Divine Mountains |
|
Week 3 |
Daoism in the Silla Period |
Prologue: Introduction of Daoism to Silla and the Record in Haedong Jeondolog |
|
Week 4 |
Balhae’s Lee Gwang-hyeon’s Baekmun-gyeol and Daoist Pursuit of Longevity and Immortality |
Prologue |
|
Week 5 |
Daoist Internal Alchemy in Cheonghaja Gwon Geuk-jung’s Commentary on the Zhouyi Cantongqi |
Prologue |
|
Week 6 |
A Study on Jeong Yu-in’s Theory of “Boyang” (Preserving Health) |
1. Introduction: Jeong Yu-in of Joseon and Isaengnok (Records on Nurturing Life) |
|
Week 7 |
The Life and Daoist Thought of Bukchang Jeong Ryeom |
Prologue |
|
Week 8 |
Korean Daoist Texts and the Daoist Lineage |
1. Prologue |
|
Week 9 |
The Daoist Thought of Jeungsan Kang Il-sun |
1. Prologue: Overview of Jeungsan Kang Il-sun's Life and Activities |
Course Overview:
|
Course Title |
The King’s Question and the Official's Response : Reading the Chaekmun(策問) of the Joseon Dynasty Civil Service Examinations |
Lecturer |
Jun-Tae Kim (Sungkyunkwan University) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Target Audience |
General |
Teaching Assistant |
- |
|
Course Filed |
Humanities |
Level |
Introductory |
|
Course Description |
This course engages students in a critical reading of chaekmun (策問, policy questions) from the Joseon civil service examinations and the candidates’ answers, drawing out lessons that remain relevant today. |
|---|---|
|
Learning Outcomes |
1. Study the chaekmun composed by kings in the Joseon civil service examinations and the corresponding daechaek (answers submitted by candidates), and, through critical reading, derive lessons applicable to contemporary society. 2. Analyze the diverse figures and themes presented in the lectures from an integrative and interdisciplinary perspective. 3. Understand the importance of self-cultivation (suyang, 修養) as the central keyword running throughout the course, and explain why self-cultivation is particularly vital for leaders. |
Course Structure:
|
Week |
Topic |
Contents |
|---|---|---|
|
Week 1 |
Introduction |
Introduction |
|
Week 2 |
The Zhongyong (Doctrine of the Mean) and Sincerity; King Jeongjo’s Question and Jeong Yak-yong's Response |
1. King Jeongjo and Jeong Yak-yong 2. Making the Right Choice “Here and Now”: Sijung (時中) 3. "Sincerity” (Seong, 誠) as the Central Axis of the Zhongyong 4. Timeliness (Siyi, 時宜) and Self-Cultivation |
|
Week 3 |
The Four Essentials of Study : King Seonjo’s Question and Jo Hui-il’s Response |
1. The King Asks 2. The Four Essentials of Study 3. Why Must a King Study? 4. The King Must Restrain His Emotions 5. The King Must Make the Best Choices |
|
Week 4 |
The Harmful Effects of Alcohol: King Jungjong’s Question and Kim Gu’s Response |
1. The King Asks 2. The Figure of Kim Gu 3. The Harmful Effects of Material Things and of the Mind 4. Confucius’ Attitude toward Drinking 5. The Role of the Leader |
|
Week 5 |
Consistency from Beginning to End: King Jungjong’s Question and Gwon Beol’s Response |
1. The King Asks 2. Why Did Emperor Taizong and Emperor Xuanzong of Tang Fall? 3. Gwon Beol Responds: Hold Firm to the Mind! 4. Reflect and Listen Attentively 5. Epilogue |
|
Week 6 |
The Standards for Advancing and Withdrawing: King Jungjong’s Question and Song Gyeom’s Response |
1. The Concept of Chulch'o (Public Office and Retirement) 2. Acting with Righteousness in Accord with the Times 3. Aspects of Chulch'o Theory in the Joseon Dynasty 4. Reconsidering Chulch'o in the Present Day |
|
Week 7 |
The Nation’s Troubles and the Court’s Corruptions: King Gwanghaegun’s Question and Im Suk-yeong’s Response |
1. The King Asks 2. National Crises and the Maladies of the Court 3. A Faltering War Hero 4. Divisive Leadership and Excessive Public Works |
|
Week 8 |
The Establishment of the Common Way: King Jungjong’s Question and Kim Ui-jeong’s Response |
1. Fairness and Right Principles 2. The Harmony of Loyalty and Integrity 3. The Role of the Prime Minister |
|
Week 9 |
The Leader’s Attitude toward Talent: King Sejong’s Question and Kang Hui-maeng’s Response |
1. The King Asks 2. Three Cases in Which Talent Cannot Be Appointed 3. How Should Talent Be Discerned? 4. Kang Hui-maeng’s Memorial to the Throne 5. King Sejong’s Appointment of Talented Officials 6. The Hall of Worthies and the Cultivation of Next-Generation Talent 7. Allowing Freedom of Speech 8. Conclusion |
|
Week 10 |
Chaekmun (Examination Questions) on the Appointment of Talent: Responses by Yi Ja, Yi Mok, Yang Sa-eon, and O Dal-je |
1. If You Wish to Gain a Good Prime Minister 2. Begin with the Intention to Cultivate Talent 3. Relationships Must Be Reciprocal 4. Ways to Ensure an Abundance of Talent 5. Conclusion |
|
Week 11 |
Lessons from the Chaekmun of Joseon |
1. Weekly Learning Overview 2. Cultivation in the Face of Great Uncertainty 3. Study Without Ceasing 4. Gaining Trust through the Common Way (Gongdo) 5. The Basic Structure of Confucian Leadership 6. Accepting Remonstrance Is a Duty, Not a Virtue 7. Upholding Principles While Pursuing Timeliness 8. Restoring Rule by Virtue and Moral Norms |



